The UK government is reportedly evaluating a proposal to introduce entrance fees for international tourists visiting the permanent collections of national museums. This initiative is part of a wider effort to explore sustainable funding solutions for the arts sector.
In response to a review of Arts Council England, the body responsible for distributing public arts funding, the government acknowledged the urgent need for long-term financial stability in the arts. Among the funding options being considered, a hotel levy is also under consultation.
However, Alison Cole, director of the Cultural Policy Unit think tank, voiced strong opposition to charging international tourists, calling it a “very bad idea.” She advocates for a hotel levy as a superior method to support the nation’s civic museums and cultural infrastructure.
Since 2001, national museums and galleries in the UK have offered free entry to all visitors, a policy widely credited with significantly boosting tourism and visitor numbers. While the Treasury had previously considered ending free entry as part of spending cuts for the November 2025 budget, these plans were abandoned following objections from culture ministers.
Separate research conducted by the Art Fund revealed that 72% of the public supports a tourist levy specifically to subsidize free entry to national museums, indicating a preference for this alternative funding model.
These proposals were detailed in the government’s official response to recommendations made by Margaret Hodge in her December review of Arts Council England. Hodge’s review urged ministers to safeguard funding from political interference and simplify bureaucratic application processes.
The government committed to exploring all recommendations, which include increasing funding to support creative careers for individuals from under-represented backgrounds and developing the creative sector nationwide. It affirmed its agreement with Hodge that the Arts Council should be “strong, politically impartial and independent,” promoting “diversity of ideas” and freedom of expression. An allocation of £8 million is earmarked to help the Arts Council streamline its application processes, allowing creators to focus more on their work and less on paperwork, moving away from a “one size fits all” strategy.
Hodge’s critique of political interference in the arts was partly fueled by Arts Council England’s controversial decision to compel the English National Opera to relocate from London to Manchester, a move she described as a “raw experience” for those involved, as part of its ‘levelling up’ agenda.
The government’s response also outlined a new fund aimed at creatives with “fewer opportunities,” alongside efforts to enhance access to arts education in schools. It also endorsed Hodge’s call for “closer engagement with communities, particularly in places where people have been less able to access or participate in arts and culture,” citing a £2 million investment in regional arts scenes and the re-establishment of regional arts boards.
Darren Henley, Chief Executive of Arts Council England, acknowledged the organization’s need to become “simpler and easier to deal with.” He stated that steps would be taken over the next six months to streamline monitoring and funding application processes. Henley also indicated that the Arts Council would explore new funding avenues, including commercial-style investments where profits are reinvested into the sector to maximize funding impact, alongside tax incentives and a philanthropy drive.
He further emphasized the Arts Council’s commitment to collaborating more closely with citizens to understand their desires for local arts scenes. Henley highlighted Bradford’s emerging “artistic confidence” as an example of how sustained regional cultural investment can profoundly transform a place’s self-perception and behavior.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy remarked, “For far too long, the benefits of culture have not been equally distributed. I refuse to sit back while communities are forgotten in our national story. Change must start today. That change begins with a culture sector that is proud and unafraid to tell the whole story of our nation.” She added, “A reformed and independent Arts Council will sit at the heart of this vision to reach, inspire and nurture young people who otherwise would not have the opportunity to be creative, let alone pursue a creative career.”